DEEGAN v. DEEGAN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 1410.

Attorney(S)

W. E. F. Deal, for Appellants: Brief practically to the same effect as that of appellants in the case (No. 1409) of Thomas H. Deegan, an Infant,
, v. Thomas Deegan, et al.,
C. E. Mack, for Respondent: Brief also practically to same effect as that for respondent in case No. 1409,

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 1410.

Attorney(S)

W. E. F. Deal, for Appellants: Brief practically to the same effect as that of appellants in the case (No. 1409) of Thomas H. Deegan, an Infant,
, v. Thomas Deegan, et al.,
C. E. Mack, for Respondent: Brief also practically to same effect as that for respondent in case No. 1409,

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MICHAEL M. DEEGAN, AN INFANT, BY HENRY NELIGH, HIS GUARDIAN, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS DEEGAN, JOHN TASSELL, DENNIS KEHOE, J. B. DAZET, W. H. COFFEY AND J. C. DUNLOP, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

The facts are declared to be the same as those in the case of Deegan v. Deegan, et al. (No. 1409), ante, by the Court in the following opinion:

Per Curiam:

This case turns on the same questions presented in the case of Deegan v. Same Defendants (No. 1409; this day decided), and it must be decided in the same way.

Judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MICHAEL M. DEEGAN, AN INFANT, BY HENRY NELIGH, HIS GUARDIAN, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS DEEGAN, JOHN TASSELL, DENNIS KEHOE, J. B. DAZET, W. H. COFFEY AND J. C. DUNLOP, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

Comments