Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

E. J. HEATH AND WIFE v. C. R. McLAUGHLIN, EXECUTOR OF JOSEPH McLAUGHLIN.

Will — Specific Legacy — Pecuniary Legacy — Abatement.

1. The bequest of certain shares of stock owned by the testator at the date of the will and at his death is a specific legacy.

2. Specific legacies do not abate with or contribute to general legacies, except where the whole estate is given in specific legacies, and then a pecuniary legacy is given, or where an intention appears in the will that the specific legacies shall so abate.

3. A provision in a will that all the legacies shall abate before there is any abatement of a designated legacy, while protecting the latter from abatement, does not affect, as to other legacies, the usual order of abatement — the general legacies first and then the specific.

CLARK, J.

The testator owned at his death the shares of stock bequeathed to the plaintiff. The legacy was a specific one. McGuire (402) v. Evans, 40 N.C. 269. It is a general rule that specific legacies do not abate or contribute to general legacies. There are exceptions, as where the whole estate is given in specific legacies and then a pecuniary legacy is given, or where an intention that the specific legacies shall abate appears in the will. White v. Beattie, 16 N.C. 320; White v. Green, 36 N.C. 45; Biddle v. Carraway, 59 N.C. 95. But nothing of that kind appears in the present case. The provision in clause 15 of the will simply provides that all the legacies shall abate before there is any abatement of the legacy given in clause 1 to his wife. But this, while protecting that legacy from abatement, does not affect as to the other legacies the usual order of abatement, to wit, the general legacies first, and then the specific legacies.

Affirmed.

Cited: In re Wiggins, 179 N.C. 327.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEALTH v. McLAUGHLIN
(Sep 1, 1894)