Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLEMENT D. CHAPDELAINE vs. DANIEL T. HANDY et als.

Under the Judiciary Act, cap. 26, § 2, which provides that in case a judgment is entered by default or by mistake, the court entering the same "may, for cause shown, set aside the same and reinstate the case, or make a new entry and take other proceedings, with proper notice to parties," the court has no jurisdiction to set aside a judgment entered by default and reinstate the case for trial, without previous notice to the parties.

PER CURIAM.

It is alleged in the petition and conceded by the counsel for the respondents that the order setting aside the judgment in the court below and reinstating the case for trial was without notice to the petitioner who was the plaintiff in the judgment. This being so, we are of the opinion that the court had no jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act, cap. 26, § 2, to make the order, the words "with proper notice to the parties," applying to the clause in relation to setting aside a judgment and reinstating the case, as well as to the clause in relation to making a new entry of the case and the taking of other proceedings.

Petition granted and writ ordered to issue.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHAPDELAINE v. HANDY
(Oct 25, 1894)