AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

GEORGE E. NASH, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur except RUGER, Ch. J., and ANDREWS, J., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NASH v. THE NEW YORK CENT. AND HUDSON RIVER R.R. CO
(Jan 13, 1891)