Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DOUGHERTY v. NEVADA BANK.

Wood v. Brady, 150 U.S. 18, affirmed and applied to this case.

THIS was an action brought by the plaintiff in error to foreclose a municipal tax or street assessment lien. In a brief filed for defendant in error it was stated that the judgment here sought to be reversed involved the validity of precisely similar extensions to those sought to be reversed in Wood v. Brady, 150 U.S. 18, and under the same statute. This statement was not denied or challenged by the counsel for the plaintiff in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD:

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of Wood v. Brady, 150 U.S. 18.

Writ dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOUGHERTY v. NEVADA BANK
(Dec 9, 1895)