Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THEODORE VAN BREMSEN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM WALZ et al., Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from denying motion to punish the surety Walz for contempt is affirmed, with costs.

Present: VAN WYCK, Ch. J., and McCARTHY, J.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BREMSEN v. WALZ
(Feb 1, 1896)