Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAROLD O. PARDEY vs. AMERICAN SHIP WINDLASS COMPANY.

By a contract of employment made by a minor and approved and confirmed by his father, the minor agreed to remain in his employer's service for three years, during which time the employer was to retain from his wages one dollar per week to be paid to the minor at the expiration of the three years. The minor left his employer's service within the three years. In an action brought by the father against the employer before the expiration of the three years to recover the amount retained during the time of service, Held, that the action could not be maintained, 1, because it was prematurely brought, and 2, because the father, by approving and confirming the agreement, had in effect emancipated his son as to the wages earned under the contract, which therefore became the property of the son and not the property of the father.

MATTESON, C.J.

We are of the opinion that the action cannot be maintained. By the terms of the agreement, the one dollar per week from the wages of the plaintiff's son, Frank Brown Pardey, retained by the defendant, was not payable until the expiration of three years, during which he was to remain in the defendant's employment. This term did not expire until April 17, 1896, and the suit was brought February 8, 1896, and consequently before the money was payable in any event.

But apart from this consideration, the plaintiff is not entitled to the money. The agreement provides for its payment, not to the plaintiff but to his son. By confirming and approving the agreement between the son and the defendant the plaintiff in effect emancipated his son, so far as the wages earned under the contract were concerned, and gave the wages to his son. They became, therefore, the property of the son, and not the property of the plaintiff.

Case remitted to the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, with direction to enter judgment for the defendant for costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARDEY v. AMER. SHIP WINDLASS CO
(Apr 29, 1896)