Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES WATCH CASE COMPANY v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY.

Common Carriers — Unreasonable Restriction of Liability — Waiver of Stipulation Limiting Liability.

1. A stipulation by an express company contained in its bill of lading that it shall not be liable for loss or damage, unless demand of payment therefor is made within thirty days from the date of the bill of lading, is an unreasonable restriction of its liability.

2. Such stipulation, even if not unreasonable, was waived by stating, in answer to the shipper's demand for the return of the package, that the company was searching for it and, when found, by accepting the shipper's instructions to sell it.

CLARK, J.

The stipulation that the defendant should not be liable for loss or damage, unless demand was made in writing within thirty days from the date of bill of lading, was held an unreasonable restriction of the common law liability of a common carrier and void in Cigar Co. v. Express Co., ante, 348. But, aside from that, the defendant waived this stipulation and is estopped by answering plaintiff's demand for return of the package that it was searching for it, and then, when it was found, accepting plaintiff's instruction to sell the same. It was not until July, 1893, that the defendant notified the plaintiff that the package was stolen. The demand in writing was made within thirty days, and action was brought within three years (The Code, 155, 1) after that date.

No error.

Cited: Mfg. Co. v. R. R., 128 N.C. 283; Deans v. R. R., 152 N.C. 172; Forney v. R. R., 167 N.C. 642.

(353)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WATCH CASE CO. v. EXPRESS CO
(Feb 1, 1897)