Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY CORCORAN et als. vs CHARLES P. BENNETT, Secretary of State.

If a political party in any town at the last preceding election poll at least two per centum of the entire vote of the town at said election, it is entitled as a party to make nominations for any officer in the town to be voted for at the next subsequent election.

PER CURIAM.

The question raised is the meaning of the provision of Gen. Laws, cap. 11, § 4, which authorizes the caucus of a political party in any town to make nominations, which party at the last preceding election polled at least two per centum of the entire vote of the town. It is agreed that at the last preceding election the Democratic party polled more than two per centum of the vote of the town of Johnston, but not for the offices of senator and representatives, because no nominations were made by the party for such offices. We do not think that the statute means to limit the authority to nominate to a percentage of the vote for the same officers, but that it means this: If the party at the preceding election cast a vote of the required amount, then it is to be recognized as a party which is to have authority to make nominations as a party for any office.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CORCORAN v. BENNETT
(Mar 23, 1897)