Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELLEN O'HARA et al. vs. MARTIN QUINN et al.

The taxes upon certain land were assessed to and paid by A. who was only a part owner thereof, his co-tenants having had no notice of the assessments and no portion of the taxes having been assessed against them or their interest in the land. Upon a claim for a proportionate reimbursement for such payment: — Held, that, as the payments were for moneys which the co-tenants were not obliged to pay, the payments did not inure to their benefit and the claim could not be allowed.

PER CURIAM.

The case shows that the taxes paid by the respondent Quinn were assessed upon the whole land in suit and against him alone, both he and the assessors supposing him to be the sole owner. No portion of the taxes was assessed against his co-tenants or against their interest in the land, and, so far as appears, no notice of the assessment was given to them. The payment therefore by Quinn did not inure to the benefit of his co-tenants. So far as they are concerned, the payments were for moneys which they were under no obligation to pay. We are of the opinion, therefore, that he is not entitled to reimbursement.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

O'HARA v. QUINN
(Jul 7, 1897)