Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FREDERICK KAFFEMAN, Respondent, v. LEOPOLD STERN et al., Appellants.

O'DWYER, J.

Assuming that "Lissauer and Sondheim" were necessary parties that fact appeared upon the face of the complaint, and the objection should have been taken by demurrer. Not having been so taken it was waived. Code Civ. Pro., § 488, subd. 5, and § 499; Fourth Nat. Bank v. Scott, 31 Hun, 301.

If it had been intended to restrict the licensors from manufacturing under the patent, such a covenant should have been inserted in the agreement.

Furthermore the defendants cannot use the patent and refuse to pay the license fees provided for by the contract. McKay v. Smith, 39 Fed. Repr. 556.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

McCARTHY, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAFFEMAN v. STERN
(May 1, 1898)