Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE AND HETTIE KING v. STEPHEN HEDGEPETH.

Bastardy Proceeding — Criminal Action — Statute of Limitations.

Bastardy proceedings are not subject to the limitation prescribed in section 1177 of The Code (two years), but are controlled by section 36 of The Code, which provides that they shall be commenced within three years from the birth of the child.

DOUGLAS, J.

This is an appeal in bastardy proceedings, wherein the defendant was convicted. The only question brought before us is the statute of limitations, the defendant contending that, as more than two years had elapsed since the birth of the child before the bringing of this action, its prosecution was barred under section 1177 of The Code. We do not think so. Whatever may be the nature of the proceedings, section 36 of The Code specifically provides that: "All (1040) examinations upon oath to charge any man with being the father of a bastard child, shall be taken within three years next after the birth of the child."

We think that this section controls the period of limitation for reasons more fully set forth in S. v. Perry, post, 1043. This being the only exception, and no error appearing upon the face of the record, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HEDGEPETH
(May 1, 1898)