Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

R. W. HICKS v. J. H. ROYAL.

Appeal — Rule 28 — Printing Exhibit — Dismissal of Appeal.

Where an exhibit, made a part of the pleadings and necessary to the understanding of a plea in the action, is not printed as a part of the record on appeal, the appeal will be dismissed under Rule 28.

PER CURIAM.

An exhibit which is made a part of the pleadings and is material to understanding the plea of "another action pending for the same cause" is not printed. Even under the former rule, the (406) motion to dismiss would have been allowed. Fleming v. McPhail, 121 N.C. 183; Barnes v. Crawford, 119 N.C. 127. Much the more so is this true under the present Rule 28 ( 121 N.C. 695) which, to avoid just such disputes as to the materiality of omitted parts, requires the entire transcript on appeal to be printed.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HICKS v. ROYAL
(May 1, 1898)