Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OTENIO LONGORIO ET AL. v. THE STATE.

Certiorari to Perfect Record — Practice.

The office of a certiorari is to perfect the record, and when a cause has been finally disposed of by dismissal on appeal, and no subsequent motion for rehearing been made, a mandate was issued, and there is no request to recall the mandate, a motion for a certiorari to perfect a record which has no longer any standing in court can not be entertained.

DAVIDSON, JUDGE.

This is a motion for a writ of certiorari. At the Dallas term, 1898, the appeal herein was dismissed because of the want of a final judgment. 44 S.W. Rep., 1089. On April 6, 1898, and subsequent to the adjournment of said Dallas term, mandate was issued. On May 2d application for certiorari was filed at Austin. A motion for rehearing has not been filed, nor a request to recall mandate, and the case stands in the attitude of asking a certiorari to perfect a record that has no standing in this court. The proceeding had been dismissed and the mandate issued in accordance with the judgment of dismissal. If appellants desired a reconsideration of their case, the proper steps, in proper time, should have been taken to have the same reviewed. The office of a certiorari is to perfect a record. It does not serve the purpose of a motion for rehearing and recall of mandate in order to reinstate the case. As presented the motion for certiorari can not be entertained. It is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OTENIO LONGORIO v. THE STATE
(Dec 21, 1898)