Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. COLLINS.

The statute prohibiting the sale of oleomargarine unless the substance is of some color other than that of yellow butter is not in conflict with the constitution of this state. When it is uncertain whether a statute of this state is in violation of the constitution of the United States, a criminal prosecution thereunder will ordinarily be sustained in order that the question may be determined by the federal courts.

YOUNG, J.

The statute upon which this indictment is founded is not in conflict with the constitution of this state (State v. Marshall, 64 N.H. 549); and for the reasons given in State v. Collins, 67 N.H. 540, the federal question is not considered. Plumley v. Massachusetts, 155 U.S. 461; Collins v. New Hampshire, 171 U.S. 30.

Exception overruled.

CHASE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. COLLINS
(Dec 1, 1899)