Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ISAIAH GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. PHILIP SACHS, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The disputed questions of fact whether the note was transferred to the plaintiff before or after maturity and whether any consideration passed between the original parties, were resolved against the plaintiff, and the record presents nothing for our consideration warranting interference with the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: FREEDMAN, P.J.; MacLEAN and LEVENTRITT, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDSMITH v. SACHS
(Dec 1, 1899)