AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES W. PINCHOT, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY and THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellants.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal herein is "from so much of the order * * * entered * * * on the 27th day of February, 1900, as denies defendants' motion to resettle the order of February 14th, 1900, by modifying the terms therein imposed."

We assume that what the defendant seeks is a modification of the terms imposed by the original order, but no appeal is taken therefrom, and we do not think that this question can be raised by appeal from so much of a subsequent order as denies the motion for a resettlement of the original order.

The appeal accordingly should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PINCHOT v. NEW YORK ELEVATED R.R. CO
(Mar 1, 1900)