AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ROYAL PHELPS CARROLL, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY and THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, HAIGHT, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Dissent: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN and LANDON, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARROLL v. NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY
(Mar 6, 1900)