Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN CLARK v. THE STATE.

Recognizance on Appeal.

Where the penalty assessed in a misdemeanor conviction is both a fine and imprisonment, the recognizance is fatally defective which states the punishment as a fine, omitting the imprisonment. The statute requires that the punishment as assessed by the jury must be stated in the recognizance.

DAVIDSON, PRESIDING JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of theft, and his punishment assessed at ten days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $25. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal because the recognizance fails to state the punishment as required by the statute. The recognizance states the punishment to be a fine of $25, omitting the ten days imprisonment in the county jail. The statute requires that the punishment assessed by the jury shall be stated in the recognizance, and, as this has not been done, that instrument is fatally defective, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

HENDERSON, Judge, absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLARK v. THE STATE
(Apr 11, 1900)