Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TRUSTEES MATHEWSON STREET M.E. CHURCH vs. JOHN SHEPARD, JR., et al.

(1) Easement in Light by Prescription. An easement in light cannot be acquired by prescription, but only by covenant or grant.

(2) Equity. Injunctions. Equity will not consider the legality of acts complained of where the bill of complaint discloses no title in the complainant to relief.

PER CURIAM.

The only title to relief which the complainants state in their bill is the obstruction of the light which would come to their church edifice but for the proposed closing of the strip of land called Comfort street.

The title to an easement in light is not adequately set forth in the bill, and the almost uniform current of authority in this country is that such an easement cannot be acquired by prescription, but only by covenant or special grant. As the complainants show no title to relief, we do not see that they are in a position to question the legality of the proceedings for the abandonment of Comfort Street as a public highway. Our opinion is, therefore, that the demurrer should be sustained.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATHEWSON ST. M.E. CHURCH v. SHEPARD
(May 18, 1900)