Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JELLISON v. JELLISON.

PEASLEE, J.

The question of whether justice required the granting of the motion is not one of law. As justice required that the order be made, and the court had power to make it (P.S., c. 176, s. 4), it is immaterial whether the application was called a petition or a motion. The parties were already in court, the libelant was given an opportunity to be heard, and if a further hearing is needed it can be had upon application.

Exception overruled.

YOUNG, J., did not sit: CHASE, J., dissented: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JELLISON v. JELLISON
(Jun 1, 1900)