AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CATHERINE J. EAVES vs. ATLANTIC NOVELTY MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Employers' Liability Act — Evidence justifying a Verdict for the Plaintiff. In an action for personal injuries under the employers' liability act, St. 1887, c. 270, evidence which, though contradictory, justifies a finding that T. was a person whose principal duty was that of a superintendent; that as such superintendent he gave to the plaintiff the order to start up the machine; that at the time of the order he had reason to know that the plaintiff might understand it as a command to try to ascertain by resuming his work whether the machine was all right; that he so understood the order and was justified in so understanding; that, acting thereon, he attempted to resume work; that while so doing and in the exercise of due care, by reason of the violent and unusual shaking of the machine, his hands were thrown from their usual place and the presser came down upon his fingers and crushed them, and that under the circumstances the order was negligent, makes a case for the plaintiff.

HAMMOND, J.

It will serve no useful purpose to recite in detail the evidence in this case. It was contradictory, but we think it would warrant a finding that Talbot was a person whose principal duty was that of a superintendent; that as such superintendent he gave to the plaintiff the order to start up the machine; that at the time of the order he had reason to know that she might understand it as a command to try to ascertain by resuming her work whether the machine was all right; that she so understood it and was justified in so understanding it; that, acting under that understanding, she attempted to resume her work; that while she was doing that and in the exercise of due care, by reason of the violent and unusual shaking of the machine her hand was thrown from its usual place and the presser came down upon her fingers and crushed them; and that under the circumstances the order was negligent. This would make a case for the plaintiff.

Under the instructions, which were full and appropriate to the issues, the jury must have found the facts to be as above stated.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EAVES v. ATLANTIC NOVELTY MANUF. CO
(Jun 20, 1900)