Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENRY S. STONE, pro ami vs. JOSEPH E.C. FARNHAM.

(1) Equity. Masters in Chancery. Trusts. Guardian and Ward. In a bill for an accounting against a trustee, payments made by him to an attorney employed by the cestui to defend the latter in proceedings instituted for the purpose of placing the cestui under guardianship, and incidentally to defend the deed conveying a portion of the trust estate to the trustee, and made at the general request of the cestui, are properly credited to the trustee as expended for the benefit of the cestui when the amount is reasonable and proper.

(2) Compensation of Trustee. Where one denies the existence of a trust and claims the fund as his own, he precludes himself from claiming compensation as trustee, although he may keep the fund safely.

PER CURIAM.

The court is of opinion that the first and second exceptions to the master's report should be overruled. The two payments, amounting to $150, were made to the attorney employed by Stone to defend him in proceedings in guardianship in Minnesota, and also, incidentally, to defend the deed which he had made to this respondent. Stone was entitled to have counsel in these matters, and the money so paid was for his benefit and according to his general request, although he did not specify the amount. There is nothing to show that the amount was unreasonable or improper.

The third and fourth exceptions to the allowances of compensation are sustained. Where one denies a trust he renders no service in the capacity of a trustee. Even though he may keep a fund safely, if he claims it as his own he precludes himself from also claiming compensation as a trustee, for he thereby denies his relation as a trustee. Moreover, the claim of ownership has caused litigation to establish the title to the fund. One cannot take the chances of claiming the fund as his own, or, failing in that, to have compensation for his services.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STONE v. FARNHAM
(Oct 12, 1900)