Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FREDERICK C. SAYLES vs. JOHN MITCHELL.

(1) Trespass quare clausum. Pleading and Practice. Evidence. In an action of trespass quare clausum fregit upon the general issue, the only questions at issue are the possession of the plaintiff and the acts of trespass by the defendant.

(2) Trespass quare clausum. Title in Defendant. The question of title in the defendant can only be put in issue in such action by special plea.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant petitions for a new trial on the ground of verdict against the evidence and of exceptions to rulings of the court.

The action being trespass quare clausum, the only issues were the possession of the plaintiff and the acts of trespass by the defendant. On these points the verdict is sustained by the evidence.

The exceptions presented by the defendant relate to the question whether the title to the real estate, upon a judicial sale, vested from the sale, by relation, upon the delivery of the deed and payment of purchase-money after the trespass alleged.

The question of title in such an action is only put in issue upon the setting up of title in the defendant. A plea of title in the defendant was filed, but was withdrawn on the day of the trial; whereupon the plaintiff was only bound to prove possession.

The requests for rulings as to a title by relation were therefore immaterial.

Petition for new trial denied, and case remitted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAYLES v. MITCHELL
(Oct 24, 1900)