Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY F. SMITH et al., Appellants, v. HOWARD GOULD, Respondent.

McCARTHY, J.

We have examined very carefully the papers presented by both sides on this appeal, as well as the cases referred to and are of the opinion that this cause does not involve the examination of a long account as provided for in section 1013, Code of Civil Procedure and ought not to be referred.

Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars' costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars' costs.

O'DWYER and SCHUCHMAN, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars' costs and motion denied, with ten dollars' costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. HOWARD GOULD
(Jan 1, 1901)