Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ABEL T. ATHERTON vs. W.H. GOLDSMITH.

(1) Assumpsit. Account. Partnership. A. and B. agreed to share the gains and losses of a particular adventure. A. furnished a certain sum of money and loaned B. an equal amount to enable him to furnish his share of the capital: — Held, that assumpsit would lie in favor of A. to recover the money loaned.

PER CURIAM.

The nonsuit in this case was erroneously granted.

In Dowling v. Clarke, 13 R.I. 134, the claim was for an unascertained balance claimed to be due on a partnership account, and for this it was held that assumpsit would not lie.

In Fry v. Potter, 12 R.I. 542, however, a case like the present one, it was held that assumpsit would lie, because, there being no general copartnership, but only an agreement to share the gains and losses of a particular adventure, and nothing outstanding to be adjusted, the transaction was closed and the losses ascertained.

This case is even stronger, from the plaintiff's testimony that the money sued for was a loan to the defendant to enable him to the speculation of purchasing options on land.

Petition for new trial granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATHERTON v. GOLDSMITH
(Feb 1, 1901)