Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

COBURN H. JOHNSTON, Plaintiff, v. PAUL BERLIN et al., Defendants.

BLANCHARD, J.

This action is brought to secure an accounting for certain commissions plaintiff claims to be due him from defendants, upon certain alleged sales and duplicate orders, under an agreement whereby plaintiff was employed by defendants as a salesman, and to recover the amount ascertained by such an accounting. Defendants contend that the action is one of which equity cannot take cognizance; that the allegations of the complaint and evidence given upon the trial disclose no relationship between plaintiff and defendants save that of salesman and employers, and that such a relationship will not support an action in equity for an accounting and that, accordingly, the action must be dismissed. This contention is sustained by the authorities. Smith v. Bodine, 74 N.Y. 30; Chaurant v. Maillard, 56 A.D. 11; McCullough v. Pence, 85 Hun, 271; Skilton v. Payne, 18 Misc. 332.

The position of the plaintiff, so far as the retention of the case for the purpose of awarding him legal relief, is concerned, is precisely the same as in Skilton v. Payne, supra. Plaintiff has not asked for such retention. He stands upon his right to equitable relief, and upon the authority of that case and the cases there cited, the complaint must be dismissed, with costs, but without prejudice to an action at law.

Complaint dismissed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSTON v. BERLIN
(May 1, 1901)