Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOOD v. WALLACE.

Lantry v. Wallace, ante 536, followed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided. The demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Phillips, holding the Circuit Court. 89 F. 11. The judgment in that court was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 97 F. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Lantry's case, the judgment in this case is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOOD v. WALLACE
(May 27, 1901)