Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

VANETA L. ALVORD vs. INHABITANTS OF CHESTER.

Schools and School Committee, Regulation. The right given to every child by St. 1898, c. 496, § 7, to attend the public schools is not unqualified, but is "subject to such reasonable regulations as to the numbers and qualifications of pupils to be admitted to the respective schools, and as to other school matters, as the school committee shall from time to time prescribe."

A regulation adopted by the school committee of a town, that children under the age of seven years must enter a certain school at the beginning of the fall term, or within three or four weeks thereafter, is a reasonable rule, and a child excluded in accordance with it has no remedy.

It is not essential to the validity of a regulation adopted by the school board of a town, that it should be recorded in the permanent record book of the committee, required to be kept by Pub. Sts. c. 44, § 27. The provision, that all the votes, orders and proceedings of the board shall be recorded by the secretary, is merely a direction to him.

BARKER, J.

The sole reason for the exclusion of the plaintiff from school was the regulation adopted by the school committee to the effect that children under the age of seven years could not enter the school except at the beginning of the fall term or within three or four weeks thereafter unless qualified to enter classes existing in the school at the time of entry.

This was a reasonable rule. Children under seven years of age, although allowed to attend the public schools, are not required to attend. St. 1898, c. 496, § 12. Grading is a permitted if not an essential feature of the public school system. The introduction, late in the school year, of a very young scholar not qualified to enter the existing classes, would tend to impair the efficiency of the school, and so to prevent the other scholars from obtaining such advancement in learning and in training as would enable them to proceed with their education in due course. The right given to every child by St. 1898, c. 496, § 7, to attend the public schools is not unqualified but is "subject to such reasonable regulations as to the numbers and qualifications of pupils to be admitted to the respective schools, and as to other school matters, as the school committee shall from time to time prescribe."

Nor was it essential to the validity of the regulation that it should be recorded in the permanent record book of the school committee, required by Pub. Sts. c. 44, § 27. That section directs the committee to appoint a secretary and directs the secretary to keep a permanent record book in which all the votes, orders and proceedings of the committee shall be recorded. But this does not make invalid all rules and orders of the committee not so recorded. Russell v. Lynnfield, 116 Mass. 365, 367. See also Libby v. Douglas, 175 Mass. 128, 130.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALVORD v. CHESTER
(Oct 18, 1901)