Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MOSES ROSENDALE et al. vs. MARY McNULTY.

(1) Depositions. Commissioners. Incriminating Answers. A deponent cannot be excused from answering questions, on the ground that her answers would criminate herself, where the questions do not show that such a result would be possible.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Mary McNulty, has refused to answer questions put to her in taking her deposition, upon the ground that her answers would criminate herself. The questions do not show that such a result would be possible, and hence the questions should have been answered. A writ of attachment against said Mary McNulty will issue, unless at such time as shall be fixed by the master, within twenty days from this date, she shall appear before him and answer the questions which she refused to answer and shall also within that time pay the costs upon this citation, to be taxed by the clerk, and an additional sum of ten dollars for counsel's fee for complainant's counsel, which sums are not to be recovered back in any event.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSENDALE v. McNULTY
(Jan 8, 1902)