Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. FREEMAN.

ARSON — Evidence — Threats — Sufficiency — The Code, Sec. 985, Subsec. 6.

Where the only evidence against a person accused of burning a barn is threats made by him, without any evidence connecting him with the execution of said threats, or with the offense charged, the trial judge should withdraw the case from the jury.

PER CURIAM.

Indictment for burning a barn with live stock, under the Code, sec. 985 (6). The only evidence against the defendant was threats made by him, without any evidence whatever connecting him with the execution of said threats or with the offense charged. The judge should, as prayed, have withdrawn the case from the jury. S. v. Rhodes, 111 N.C. 647, is exactly in point. Indeed the Attorney-General, with commendable frankness, conceded as much on the argument here.

Error.

(726)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FREEMAN
(Oct 1, 1902)