Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE R. WHITESIDES v. THE STATE.

New Information — Defendant's Right to Plead to.

Where an original information is quashed and a new one is filed, it becomes a new case, and defendant, after his arrest, is entitled to two days in which to prepare and file his pleadings to such new information.

DAVIDSON, PRESIDING JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully killing a cow, and fined $25.

When this cause was called for trial, the court quashed the information, and immediately permitted the prosecution to file new pleadings, over appellant's objection. This action of the court was correct. The court then called on appellant to answer to the new information. Appellant asked for two days time in which to prepare his cause and file written pleadings, which was refused by the court, and exception taken. This exception was well taken. The filing of the new information made a new case, and appellant was entitled, after his arrest, to the two days in which to prepare his cause and file the written pleadings. White's Ann. Code Crim. Proc., art. 567, sec. 577. After an examination of the other questions suggested for revision, we are of opinion the court's rulings were correct. For the error indicated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITESIDES v. THE STATE
(Jan 28, 1903)