Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRAZIER v. WILKES.

Negligence — Damages — Accidents — Railroads — Personal Injuries.

No act or omission, though resulting in damage, can be deemed actionable negligence unless the one responsible could, by the exercise of ordinary care, under all the circumstances, have foreseen that it might result in damage to some one.

PER CURIAM.

The facts in the case come clearly within the language of Justice Montgomery, speaking for the Court in Raiford v. R. R., 130 N.C. 597: "No act or omission, though resulting in damage, can be deemed actionable negligence unless the one responsible could, by the exercise of ordinary care, under all the circumstances, have (438) foreseen that it might result in damage to some one. " This is one of those misfortunes against which no reasonable human foresight could have made provision.

Affirmed.

WALKER, J., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of this case.

Cited: Fuller v. R. R., 140 N.C. 484; Lassiter v. R. R., 150. N.C. 486.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRAZIER v. WILKES
(Apr 1, 1903)