Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETTENGILL v. AMHERST.

In the absence of a contract, a town is not liable for medical attendance upon persons quarantined by order of the board of health during the prevalence of a contagious disease.

WALKER, J.

The verdict establishes the fact that the plaintiff's services were not rendered at the request of the town, or under any contract with it therefor. The board of health did not employ the plaintiff, or attempt, as a statutory agent of the town, to pledge its credit for the plaintiff's services rendered to Owen. The board did not deem it "wise or necessary" (Laws 1899, c. 100, s. 1) to employ the plaintiff in this case at the expense of the town. Whether there was a moral obligation, under the circumstances, resting upon the board and the town to provide Owen with medical attendance during the confinement of his family in quarantine, is immaterial in this action. The town could only be liable upon a legal contract, which the case shows did not exist. French v. Benton, 44 N.H. 28; Buxton v. Chesterfield, 60 N.H. 357, 360.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETTENGILL v. AMHERST
(Apr 7, 1903)