AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

The Barber Asphalt Pa v. ng Company, Respondent,

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

INGRAHAM, J.:

There is presented upon this appeal the same question that was presented in the case of Rose v. Low ( 85 App. Div. 461), and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Brunt, P.J., Patterson, Hatch and Laughlin, JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jul 1, 1903)