Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CATHERINE E. STANFORD vs. INHABITANTS OF HYDE PARK.

Way, Defect in highway. Whether a grade stake fourteen inches high, standing about two feet inside of the location of a highway of a suburban town outside of the wrought roadway, near or opposite a regular stopping place of an electric car line, is a defect in the highway for which the town is liable, is a question of fact for the jury.

HAMMOND, J.

This is a very plain case. There was but little conflict in the evidence; and it is unnecessary to recite it in detail or to cite authorities to show that the questions whether the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care, whether the stake was the cause of the injury, whether in view of the amount and character of public travel in that vicinity the way was reasonably safe and convenient, or by reason of the existence of the stake was defective, whether the defect might have been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on the part of the town, and whether the town had, or by the exercise of proper care and diligence on its part might have had, notice of the defect, are questions, not of law for the court, but of fact for the jury. The first, second and seventh requests were therefore properly refused. The other rulings requested, so far as material, were in substance given.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STANFORD v. HYDE PARK
(Feb 29, 1904)