Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

KATHERINE C.K. HAGAN, Appellant, v. SIDNEY WARD, Indi

Per Curiam.

In Hagan v. Sone ( 174 N.Y. 317) the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered and affirmed by the Appellate Division.

On appeal this court held that when evidence is given of such a character that different inferences may fairly and reasonably be drawn from it, the fact must be determined by the jury.

In the case before us the trial judge, on evidence of a similar character, has decided the issues in favor of the defendants, upon which decision judgment was entered and affirmed by the Appellate Division. The facts as thus settled are binding on this court.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to defendant Sone.

PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAGAN v. WARD
(Mar 15, 1904)