AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOHN H. USHER, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Dissenting: PARKER, Ch. J., and CULLEN, J. Absent: HAIGHT, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

USHER v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAIL. CO
(Aug 5, 1904)