Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRYANT LEE v. THE STATE.

Adultery — Information — Marriage.

An information which alleged that appellant being then and there lawfully married to another person, to wit.: Alice Lee, who was then and there living, had carnal intercourse with Addie Anderson, etc.; sufficiently alleged the fact that defendant and the party with whom he committed adultery were not married to each other.

HENDERSON, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of adultery, fined $200, and appeals. There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions in the record. Appellant questions the information on the ground that it fails to allege that defendant and Addie Anderson (the party with whom the adultery was alleged to have been committed) were not married to each other. An examination of the information shows that this allegation is sufficiently certain. The information states that appellant "being then and there lawfully married to another person, to wit: Alice Lee, who was then and there living, had carnal intercourse with Addie Anderson." This, under all the authorities, is sufficient. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEE v. THE STATE
(Dec 17, 1904)