Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TRANQUILLINO RUIZ v. THE STATE.

Murder in Second Degree — Statement of Facts — Practice on Appeal.

Where the record on appeal is without bill of exceptions or statement of facts, and the motion for new trial related only to alleged errors in the charge of the court, the Court of Criminal Appeals can not determine under article 723, Code of Criminal Procedure, whether appellant was injured by such charges, and the judgment must be affirmed.

BROOKS, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at twenty-five years confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us without bill of exceptions or statement of facts. The motion for new trial relates only to alleged errors in the charge of the court. Under article 723 the facts not being before us we cannot determine whether or not appellant was injured by such charges, conceding them to be erroneous. No error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUIZ v. THE STATE
(Jun 23, 1905)