Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH W. NEEDHAM, Respondent, v. THE INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT Co., Appellant.

SCOTT, J.

There was no proof of negligence. All that is testified to is by the plaintiff that, as he walked toward the door, the train came to a "sudden stop" and he was thrown down. This is not sufficient to justify the inference that defendant or any of its servants was negligent. The complaint should have been dismissed.

BISCHOFF and FITZGERALD, JJ., concur.

Complaint dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEEDHAM v. INTERBOROUGH R.T. CO
(Nov 1, 1905)