Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MEYER OSTROM, Appellant, v. PHILIP SAPOLSKY, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The motion made by the plaintiff herein was, clearly, a motion to amend or modify the judgment and, as such, came within the provisions of section 254 of the Municipal Court Act; and, not having been made within five days, as therein prescribed, the court below had no jurisdiction to entertain it and could not grant the relief asked for. Buschbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. 85. The appeal herein, however, being from the judgment as well as the order, this court may, upon appeal, "reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or final order appealed from" (§ 310, Mun. Ct. Act), and the judgment herein may be modified by inserting therein the words: "Defendant liable to arrest and imprisonment on execution."

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Present: SCOTT, BISCHOFF and MCLEAN, JJ.

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OSTROM v. SAPOLSKY
(Dec 1, 1905)