Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

THE CAMBRIDGE SOCIETY, Respondent, v. WALTER M. ELLIOT, Appellant.

O'GORMAN, J.

The defendant agreed to buy a book at a stipulated price, to be paid in installments, the title to remain in the vendor until the payment of the last installment. The following day the defendant, in writing, cancelled the order, and refused to accept the book when the same was tendered. This action was brought to recover the contract price and the judgment for the plaintiff is criticized on the ground that, the title not having been transferred to the buyer, the seller's sole remedy is an action for damages representing the difference between the contract price and the market value. National Cash Reg. Co. v. Schmidt, 48 A.D. 473, is cited as an authority in support of this proposition. But this court in Cash Register v. Zinnio, 39 Misc. Rep. 311, held, in a similar case, that an action might be brought for the contract price and the Appellate Division in the Third Department in Gray v. Booth, 64 A.D. 231, reached the same conclusion and refused to follow National Cash v. Schmidt, supra.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

SCOTT and NEWBURGER, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAMBRIDGE SOCIETY v. ELLIOT
(Mar 1, 1906)