Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. NAUD a.

A person who has been arraigned upon a criminal charge and is awaiting the action of the grand jury has no right to take depositions under section Public Statutes.

BINGHAM, J.

When the notice to take depositions was served upon the solicitor, no criminal case was pending against the defendant in which depositions could be taken or used, and the justice of the peace acted without authority of law in ordering the caption to proceed. At that time the defendant had simply been bound over to await the action of the grand jury. No indictment had been found against him, and whether one ever would be was a question about which nothing could then be known. Section 13, chapter 225, of the Public Statutes, contemplates the pendency of a criminal action in which depositions are to be taken and used, the same as section 1 contemplates the pendency of a civil action when notice is given under it. Bundy v. Hyde, 50 N.H. 116, 120; Kingsbury v. Smith, 13 N.H. 109; Ela v. Rand, 4 N.H. 54. Until the defendant was indicted no criminal case was pending against him (People v. Restell, 3 Hill 289, 294); and as no indictment had been found when the notice was given, the proceeding was void.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. NAUD
(Apr 3, 1906)