Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRY B. VAN DER BEEK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL THOMASON, Appellant.

CLINCH, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages resulting from an injury alleged to have been caused by defendant's negligence. Defendant set up on the trial a general release which plaintiff testified he had executed voluntarily and also that he had received from the defendant the sum therein named. Plaintiff's counsel objected that the release was signed without his consent, and it would seem that the learned justice refused to dismiss the complaint and allowed the case to go to the jury for this reason. It is well settled that a plaintiff has a right to settle his action at any time, whether his attorney consents or not. It has also been held that the Municipal Court has no power to enforce an attorney's lien, if indeed such a lien exists in that court. People ex rel. Jaffe v. Fitzpatrick, 35 Misc. 456.

It is apparent for these reasons that the complaint should have been dismissed.

GILDERSLEEVE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VAN DER BEEK v. THOMASON
(May 1, 1906)