AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANK J. FARRELL, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

WOODWARD, J.:

The plaintiff, driving a one-horse delivery wagon on Myrtle avenue, Flushing, was injured by his horse falling into a hole and throwing him from the wagon. It appears that it had been raining a few days prior to the accident and that the surface of the street had nothing to indicate that there was any defect. But when the horse reached the point where the accident occurred the surface caved in, showing a cavity as large as a barrel. There was some evidence that there had been other cave-ins along the sewer in this highway, and that the authorities had filled them up as soon as they were discovered, and we fail to see how the city could be charged with negligence where there was no notice, actual or constructive, that a defect existed. The court charged that there was no evidence of any defect in the sewer to cause the cave-in, and the law does not impose the burden of inspection to discover a possible defect in a highway where the same has been properly constructed. All that is required is reasonable care, and we are of opinion that the evidence failed to show a lack of such care on the part of the defendant.

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

JENKS, GAYNOR and RICH, JJ., concurred; HOOKER, J., dissented.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FARRELL v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jun 22, 1906)