Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD A. BELL and HATTIE B. KARSCH, Respondents, v. KARSCH BREWING COMPANY, Tenant-Respondent, and GEORGE KAHRMANN, Under-tenant-Appellant.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is a summary proceeding. The petition alleged "that said petitioners are the landlords of the premises hereinafter described." This was the only allegation therein, setting forth or attempting to set forth the interest of the petitioners in said premises as required by section 2235 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This statement has repeatedly been held to be insufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the court to entertain these proceedings. Ferber v. Apfel, 99 N.Y.S. 215, and cases there cited. Prompt objection to the form of the petition was made by the defendant herein, but without avail, and a final order in the landlords' favor was made. It must be reversed.

FITZGERALD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, with costs to appellant.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BELL v. KARSCH BREWING CO
(Dec 1, 1906)