Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

WASHINGTON AND VANDEMERE RAILROAD COMPANY v. RALEIGH AND PAMLICO SOUND RAILROAD COMPANY.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court from the record in this case that there is at present no irreparable injury and no immediate conflict between the plaintiff and the defendant at the crossing mentioned in the pleadings, and that the plaintiff's road is not yet constructed, the judgment refusing the injunction at this time is affirmed, without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to renew the motion in the Superior Court.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

R. R. v. R. R
(Feb 1, 1907)