AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY A. BAKER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

GAYNOR, J.:

The complaint alleges permanent injuries in general terms. A bill of particulars thereof should have been ordered. It was apparently denied on the ground that the defendant would not, as a condition of granting the motion, waive its right to have a physical examination of the plaintiff. This was error. The particulars of the injuries may in themselves furnish reason for a physical examination. Too many other particulars were asked for, and the habit in that respect should be restrained.

The order should be reversed and the motion granted in respect of permanent injuries, without costs.

HIRSCHBERG, P.J., JENKS, HOOKER and RICH, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and motion granted for a bill of particulars in respect of permanent injuries claimed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAKER v. NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY CO
(Jan 25, 1907)