Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENRY KOCH v. MISSOURI VALLEY BRIDGE IRON COMPANY.

Briefs — Assignment not Copied.

Where the assignments of error are not copied in appellant's brief, they will not be considered, and the case will be affirmed in the absence of fundamental error.

KEY, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE. —

The transcript contains only two assignments of error, neither of which are copied in appellant's brief, as required by Rule 29. On account of this violation of that rule appellee in its brief objects to appellant's brief and to consideration by this court of the grounds for reversal therein urged. Though appellee's brief has been on file over three months, appellant has made no effort to remedy the defect in his brief. Therefore, we sustain appellee's objection. (Chappell v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 75 Tex. 82; Harris v. Crabtree, 4 Texas Civ. App. 321[ 4 Tex. Civ. App. 321]; Horseman v. Coleman County, 57 S.W. Rep., 304; Bowman v. Hoffman, 74 S.W. Rep., 340.)

We have discovered no fundamental error and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KOCH v. MISSOURI VALLEY BRIDGE IRON CO
(Apr 10, 1907)